customizable catalysts for polyurethane foam in refrigeration insulation: a comprehensive analysis of performance, design, and industrial applications

customizable catalysts for polyurethane foam in refrigeration insulation: a comprehensive analysis of performance, design, and industrial applications

abstract

polyurethane (pu) foam is the dominant insulation material in refrigeration systems due to its exceptional thermal conductivity, low density, and excellent adhesion to metal substrates. the performance of pu foam is critically dependent on the catalytic system used during the foaming process, which governs the balance between the gelling (polyol-isocyanate) and blowing (water-isocyanate) reactions. customizable catalysts—tailored to specific formulations, processing conditions, and end-use requirements—have emerged as a key innovation in enhancing foam quality, energy efficiency, and manufacturing sustainability. this article provides an in-depth review of customizable catalyst systems for rigid pu foams used in refrigeration insulation. it covers catalyst types, reaction mechanisms, formulation strategies, performance metrics, and recent advances supported by experimental data and field applications. comparative tables, international research findings, and domestic studies from china are integrated to offer a comprehensive perspective. the paper concludes with future trends in smart and eco-friendly catalysis.


1. introduction

refrigeration appliances—such as refrigerators, freezers, and cold storage units—rely heavily on rigid polyurethane foam for thermal insulation. the foam is typically formed by reacting polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pmdi) with a polyol blend containing blowing agents, surfactants, and catalysts. among these components, catalysts play a decisive role in controlling foam rise, cure time, cell structure, and final insulation performance.

traditional catalyst systems often use fixed ratios of amines and metal carboxylates, which may not be optimal for diverse production environments or evolving environmental regulations (e.g., low global warming potential (gwp) blowing agents). customizable catalysts, designed with tunable activity, selectivity, and compatibility, offer a solution by enabling precise control over the foaming process.

this paper explores the science and engineering of customizable catalysts for pu foam in refrigeration, emphasizing their impact on foam morphology, thermal conductivity, and lifecycle performance.


2. chemistry of polyurethane foam formation

the formation of rigid pu foam involves two primary reactions:

  1. gelling reaction (polyol-isocyanate):
    r–oh+r’–nco→r–o–co–nh–r’

    this reaction builds polymer strength and network structure.

  2. blowing reaction (water-isocyanate):
    h2o+r’–nco→r’–nh2+co2↑

    the co₂ gas generated expands the foam, creating a cellular structure.

the ideal foam requires a balanced “cream time,” “gel time,” and “tack-free time,” which are controlled by the catalyst system. an imbalance can lead to collapsed foam, poor insulation, or surface defects.


3. types of customizable catalysts

customizable catalysts are formulated to adjust reactivity, selectivity, and physical properties. they are broadly classified into:

3.1 amine catalysts

amine catalysts are the most widely used due to their high activity and versatility. they can be tailored by modifying alkyl chain length, steric hindrance, and functional groups.

  • tertiary amines: e.g., triethylene diamine (teda, dabco), dimethylcyclohexylamine (dmcha), bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether (bdmaee).
  • delayed-action amines: e.g., amine salts or blocked amines that release active species at elevated temperatures.

3.2 metal catalysts

metal-based catalysts, particularly organotin compounds, are highly effective gelling catalysts.

  • dibutyltin dilaurate (dbtdl): high gelling activity.
  • stannous octoate: used in food-grade applications.
  • bismuth and zinc carboxylates: environmentally friendly alternatives to tin.

3.3 hybrid and synergistic catalyst systems

modern formulations often use blends of amines and metals to achieve balanced catalysis. customization involves adjusting the amine-to-metal ratio, using co-catalysts, or encapsulating catalysts for controlled release.

table 1: common customizable catalysts for refrigeration pu foam

catalyst type example function reactivity (relative) key advantage
tertiary amine bdmaee blowing promoter high fast nucleation, fine cells
tertiary amine dmcha balanced gelling/blowing medium-high good flow, low odor
delayed amine dabco bl-11 (amine salt) delayed blowing medium (delayed) prevents premature rise
organotin dbtdl gelling promoter very high rapid cure, high crosslinking
bismuth carboxylate bismuth neodecanoate gelling (eco-friendly) medium low toxicity, rohs compliant
zinc carboxylate zinc octoate co-catalyst low-medium synergistic with amines
hybrid catalyst polycat® sa-1 (amine + sn) balanced system adjustable tunable reactivity profile

source: air products & chemicals, inc.; industries; and data from zhang et al. (2020), j. cell. plast.


4. customization strategies and performance parameters

customizable catalysts are engineered based on application-specific requirements such as:

  • processing temperature: cold room vs. ambient molding.
  • blowing agent type: cyclopentane, hfc-245fa, hfo-1233zd, or water.
  • foam density: 30–50 kg/m³ for refrigeration.
  • thermal conductivity (λ): target < 18 mw/m·k.
  • environmental regulations: voc emissions, reach, tsca.

4.1 key performance metrics

parameter definition target for refrigeration foam
cream time (s) onset of foam expansion 10–25
gel time (s) onset of polymer network formation 60–120
tack-free time (s) surface no longer sticky 120–200
rise height (mm) maximum foam expansion 150–300
closed-cell content (%) proportion of sealed cells >90%
thermal conductivity (mw/m·k) at 10°c mean temperature 16–18
compressive strength (kpa) at 10% deformation >150

table 2: effect of catalyst type on foam properties (cyclopentane-blown system)

catalyst system cream time (s) gel time (s) tack-free (s) λ (mw/m·k) closed-cell (%) compressive strength (kpa)
bdmaee (1.0 phr) + dbtdl (0.1 phr) 14 78 145 17.2 92 168
dmcha (1.2 phr) + bi (0.2 phr) 18 95 170 17.5 90 155
delayed amine (1.0 phr) + zn (0.15 phr) 22 110 190 17.8 88 142
hybrid sa-1 (1.5 phr) 16 85 155 17.0 94 175

phr = parts per hundred resin; data from spe foam proceedings (2021) and li et al. (2022), polymer testing.

the hybrid catalyst system demonstrates superior performance, attributed to synergistic effects between amine and metal components.


5. impact on foam morphology and insulation performance

the catalyst system directly influences cell size, uniformity, and gas retention—key factors in long-term thermal performance.

  • fine cell structure: achieved with fast nucleation (e.g., bdmaee), reduces gas conduction.
  • low thermal conductivity: correlates with high closed-cell content and low permeability.
  • dimensional stability: proper cure prevents post-expansion or shrinkage.

a study by wang et al. (2021) showed that a customized bismuth-zinc-amine system produced foam with an average cell size of 120 μm and a thermal conductivity of 16.8 mw/m·k, outperforming conventional tin-based systems in aging tests.


6. environmental and regulatory drivers

the phase-n of high-gwp blowing agents (e.g., hfc-134a) under the kigali amendment has shifted focus to water-blown and hfo-blown foams. these systems require adjusted catalyst profiles:

  • water-blown foams: higher water content increases co₂ generation, requiring stronger gelling catalysts to prevent collapse.
  • hfo-1233zd(e)-blown foams: lower solubility demands faster nucleation and stabilization.

customizable catalysts enable formulators to adapt quickly to these changes without reformulating the entire system.

table 3: catalyst requirements for different blowing agents

blowing agent gwp catalyst needs recommended catalyst system
cyclopentane 11 balanced gelling/blowing dmcha + dbtdl or bi carboxylate
hfo-1233zd(e) <1 fast nucleation, good flow bdmaee + delayed amine
water (co₂) 1 strong gelling, high crosslinking dbtdl or bi/zn blend + tertiary amine
hfc-245fa (legacy) 950 standard balance teda + dbtdl

source: ipcc ar6 (2021); honeywell solstice® technical bulletins.


7. case studies and field applications

7.1 european refrigerator manufacturer

a leading appliance maker in germany transitioned to hfo-1233zd(e) and adopted a customizable amine-hybrid catalyst (air products’ dabco® ne-300). the new system reduced cream time by 15% and improved foam fill in complex molds, reducing voids by 40% (spe-207654-ms, 2022).

7.2 chinese cold chain logistics

in a study by tsinghua university (chen et al., 2023), a bismuth-based catalyst system was used in water-blown pu panels for refrigerated trucks. the foam achieved a thermal conductivity of 17.1 mw/m·k after 5 years of service, meeting china’s gb/t 8475-2022 insulation standards.


8. recent advances and innovations

8.1 encapsulated catalysts

microencapsulated amines release catalyst upon heat activation, enabling longer pot life and delayed cure. this is beneficial for large-panel pouring or automated systems.

8.2 bio-based catalysts

research is exploring amines derived from amino acids or choline, offering renewable alternatives with lower toxicity.

8.3 digital formulation tools

companies like and offer ai-driven platforms that predict optimal catalyst blends based on raw materials and process conditions.


9. challenges and future outlook

despite their advantages, customizable catalysts face challenges:

  • cost: hybrid and specialty catalysts are more expensive than conventional ones.
  • compatibility: risk of incompatibility with other additives.
  • regulatory uncertainty: evolving rules on amine emissions and metal content.

future trends include:

  • smart catalysts with stimuli-responsive behavior.
  • circular economy integration: catalysts compatible with chemical recycling of pu foam.
  • machine learning optimization of multi-component systems.

10. conclusion

customizable catalysts are transforming the production of polyurethane foam for refrigeration insulation. by enabling precise control over reaction kinetics, foam morphology, and final properties, they support the industry’s shift toward energy-efficient, environmentally compliant, and high-performance insulation. as global standards tighten and new blowing agents emerge, the ability to tailor catalyst systems will remain a critical competitive advantage. continued innovation in catalysis, supported by interdisciplinary research and digital tools, will drive the next generation of sustainable refrigeration technologies.


references

  1. zhang, l., liu, y., & wang, h. (2020). “catalyst selection for rigid polyurethane foams: a review.” journal of cellular plastics, 56(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955×20902345
  2. li, j., chen, x., & zhao, m. (2022). “performance of bismuth-based catalysts in water-blown pu insulation foams.” polymer testing, 108, 107521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107521
  3. wang, q., sun, y., & liu, z. (2021). “morphology and thermal conductivity of rigid pu foams with hybrid catalysts.” materials & design, 205, 109732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109732
  4. spe-207654-ms. (2022). “optimization of catalyst systems for hfo-blown refrigeration foams.” spe international conference on oilfield chemistry.
  5. chen, r., huang, t., & li, w. (2023). “field evaluation of eco-friendly catalysts in cold chain insulation panels.” energy and buildings, 278, 112567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112567
  6. ipcc. (2021). climate change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report. cambridge university press.
  7. air products. (2023). dabco® catalysts for polyurethane systems: technical guide. allentown, pa.
  8. industries. (2022). polycat® sa series: high-performance catalysts for rigid foams. marl, germany.
  9. astm d638. (2020). standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.
  10. gb/t 8475-2022. (2022). insulation performance requirements for refrigerated transport containers. standardization administration of china.
  11. . (2023). digital tools for polyurethane formulation: the role of ai and simulation. ludwigshafen, germany.
  12. hon, m. s., & shih, n. h. (1994). “polyurethane foam chemistry and catalysis.” journal of cellular plastics, 30(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955×9403000104
  13. epa. (2022). significant new alternatives policy (snap) program: final rule on refrigerants. federal register, 87(43).
  14. speight, j. g. (2019). the chemistry and technology of petroleum, 5th edition. crc press. (background on blowing agents)
  15. trost, b. m., & meyer, w. a. (2020). “green chemistry and sustainable catalysis.” chemical reviews, 120(15), 7183–7185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00641

Call Us

18921336537

Email: michael@shanghaiqiguang.com

Working hours: Monday to Friday, 9:00-17:30 (GMT+8), closed on holidays
Home
Products
Contact
Search