enhancing cushion comfort with high-performance polyurethane open cell additives
abstract
the pursuit of superior comfort in cushioning applications—ranging from automotive seating to home furniture and medical supports—has led to significant advancements in polyurethane (pu) foam technology. a key factor in achieving enhanced comfort and breathability is the development of high-performance polyurethane open cell additives. these additives are designed to modify the foam’s cellular structure, promoting greater air permeability, reduced heat retention, and improved pressure distribution. this article provides a comprehensive overview of open cell additives for polyurethane foams, including their chemical composition, performance parameters, application methods, and environmental impact. supported by comparative data in tables and references to both international and domestic studies, this work offers a fresh and in-depth analysis tailored for formulators, manufacturers, and product developers in the foam industry.

1. introduction
comfort in cushioning materials is not solely a function of softness or density—it is deeply tied to the foam’s microstructure, particularly the open cell content. traditional polyurethane foams often exhibit a combination of open and closed cells, which can limit airflow and lead to heat buildup and discomfort during prolonged use. open cell additives have emerged as a critical solution to this challenge, enabling the production of foams with higher open cell content, improved air circulation, and enhanced pressure relief.
open cell additives work by modifying the surface tension and cell structure during the foaming process, encouraging the rupture of cell membranes and the formation of interconnected pores. this article explores the latest developments in these additives, focusing on their chemical structure, functional performance, and practical applications in enhancing cushion comfort.
2. chemistry and classification of open cell additives
2.1 types of open cell additives
open cell additives can be broadly classified into three categories based on their chemical nature:
2.1.1 silicone-based additives
silicone surfactants are the most commonly used open cell additives. they function as cell-opening agents by reducing surface tension at the air-polymer interface during foam expansion.

examples:
- tegostab® series ()
- byk-cera® (byk additives)
- niax® silicone surfactants ()
2.1.2 non-silicone surfactants
these include polyether-modified siloxanes, fluorinated surfactants, and polyethylene glycol derivatives. they are often used in combination with silicone surfactants to enhance open cell formation without compromising foam stability.
2.1.3 particulate additives
micro- or nano-particles such as calcium carbonate, silica, or zeolites can be used to create physical disruptions in the cell walls, promoting open cell formation. these are often used in hybrid formulations.
2.2 mechanism of action
open cell additives operate by:
- reducing interfacial tension to promote cell wall rupture
- stabilizing bubble growth to prevent collapse
- controlling cell size and distribution for uniformity

3. product parameters and technical specifications
table 1: typical properties of high-performance open cell additives
| property | silicone-based additive | non-silicone surfactant | particulate additive |
|---|---|---|---|
| appearance | clear to amber liquid | clear to milky liquid | white powder |
| active content (%) | 90–100 | 30–80 | 100 |
| viscosity at 25°c (mpa·s) | 100–500 | 50–200 | – |
| ph (1% solution) | 5.5–7.0 | 6.0–8.0 | – |
| solubility in polyol | fully miscible | partial to full | insoluble |
| recommended dosage (phr*) | 0.1–1.0 | 0.2–1.5 | 0.5–3.0 |
*phr = parts per hundred resin (polyol)
4. performance evaluation in cushion foams
4.1 key performance indicators
the effectiveness of open cell additives is evaluated based on several foam properties:
- open cell content (%)
- air permeability (l/m²·s)
- compression set
- resilience
- thermal conductivity
- surface comfort index
table 2: performance comparison of foam with and without open cell additives
| parameter | control foam (no additive) | with open cell additive |
|---|---|---|
| open cell content (%) | 60–70 | 85–95 |
| air permeability (l/m²·s) | 200–300 | 500–700 |
| thermal conductivity (w/m·k) | 0.025 | 0.021 |
| compression set (%) | 15 | 10 |
| resilience (%) | 60 | 65 |
| surface temperature after 30 min use (°c) | 38 | 34 |
the data clearly demonstrates that open cell additives significantly enhance breathability and reduce heat retention, contributing directly to improved user comfort.
5. application in cushioning industries
5.1 automotive seating
automotive manufacturers increasingly use open cell additives in seat cushions to improve thermal comfort, moisture management, and long-term sitting comfort. foams with higher open cell content allow better air circulation, reducing the risk of heat build-up and sweating.
5.2 home furniture
in sofas, recliners, and mattresses, open cell foams provide softer initial touch, better pressure distribution, and reduced body imprinting. these properties are especially valued in high-end furniture and ergonomic seating.
5.3 medical and healthcare
open cell foams are used in pressure ulcer prevention cushions, wheelchair seating, and hospital mattresses. their ability to distribute pressure evenly and enhance airflow makes them ideal for patients with limited mobility.
6. effect on foam processing
open cell additives influence foam processing in several ways:
table 3: impact of open cell additives on foam processing parameters
| parameter | without additive | with additive |
|---|---|---|
| gel time (seconds) | 80–90 | 75–85 |
| tack-free time (seconds) | 110–130 | 100–120 |
| rise height (mm) | 150 | 145 |
| foam density (kg/m³) | 45 | 43 |
| surface appearance | slightly closed | open, smooth |
| cell structure | mixed | uniform, open |
while open cell additives slightly reduce foam density and can affect rise height, they improve overall foam uniformity and processability.
7. environmental and health considerations
with increasing regulatory scrutiny on chemical additives, it is essential to evaluate the toxicity, emissions, and biodegradability of open cell additives.
table 4: toxicity and environmental profile
| additive type | ld₅₀ (rat, oral, mg/kg) | voc emissions | biodegradability | regulatory status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| silicone-based | >2000 | low | low | reach compliant |
| non-silicone surfactant | 1500–2000 | low | moderate | reach compliant |
| particulate additive | >2000 | very low | low | reach compliant |
most open cell additives are non-toxic and meet global safety standards such as reach, rohs, and california proposition 65. however, particulate additives may pose dust inhalation risks during handling, requiring appropriate safety measures.
8. case studies and industrial applications
8.1 automotive application (germany)
a german automotive supplier integrated a silicone-based open cell additive into its seat foam formulation. the results included:
- 20% increase in open cell content
- 30% improvement in air permeability
- 2°c reduction in surface temperature during 1-hour driving simulation
- enhanced initial softness and pressure relief
8.2 mattress manufacturer (china)
a leading chinese mattress producer adopted a hybrid additive system combining silicone surfactant and particulate filler. benefits included:
- improved breathability and cooling effect
- reduced voc emissions
- better durability and reduced sagging over time
9. comparative analysis with other foam additives
| additive type | function | open cell enhancement | comfort impact | processing ease | environmental impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| silicone surfactant | cell stabilizer + open cell agent | high | high | easy | low |
| non-silicone surfactant | surface tension modifier | moderate | moderate | moderate | moderate |
| particulate filler | physical cell disruptor | moderate | moderate | challenging | low |
| flame retardant | fire safety | none | none | may affect foam structure | varies |
| enzymatic additive | biodegradable modifier | low | low | experimental | high |
10. future trends and research directions
current research is focused on:
- sustainable open cell additives derived from bio-based materials
- hybrid formulations combining silicone and particulate additives for enhanced performance
- nanotechnology-based additives for precise control of cell structure
- low-voc and low-odor systems for sensitive applications (e.g., infant products, healthcare)
a 2024 study from the university of manchester (reed et al.) explored the use of bio-silicone surfactants derived from renewable feedstocks, showing comparable performance to traditional additives with a 40% reduction in carbon footprint.
11. conclusion
high-performance polyurethane open cell additives play a pivotal role in enhancing cushion comfort across a wide range of applications. by optimizing foam structure for greater air permeability, reduced heat retention, and improved pressure distribution, these additives contribute directly to user satisfaction and product longevity. as the industry moves toward more sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions, the development of next-generation open cell additives will continue to be a key area of innovation.
references
- reed, j., & patel, a. (2024). bio-based surfactants for sustainable polyurethane foam applications. green chemistry, 26(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3gc02345k
- european chemicals agency (echa). (2024). candidate list of substances of very high concern. retrieved from https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list
- zhang, w., liu, y., & chen, m. (2023). development of open cell additives for medical foam applications. chinese journal of polymer science, 41(5), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-023-2912-z
- iso 2783:2019. flexible cellular polymeric materials — determination of air permeability.
- astm d3574-21. standard test methods for flexible cellular materials—slab, bonded, and molded urethane foams.
- johnson, r., & kim, h. (2022). air permeability and thermal comfort in cushion foams. journal of cellular plastics, 58(6), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955×221098765
- rohs directive 2011/65/eu. restriction of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
- wang, x., & li, z. (2021). silicone surfactants in polyurethane foam: a review. progress in polymer science, 118, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101412
- industries. (2023). technical data sheet: tegostab® open cell additives. essen, germany.
- reach regulation (ec) no 1907/2006. registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals.
![DMAEE CAS1704-62-7 2-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethoxy]ethanol](http://dmaee.cn/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/cropped-logo1.jpg)