polyurethane surfactant for water-based coatings: a comprehensive review
1. introduction
polyurethane (pu) surfactants play a crucial role in the formulation of water-based coatings, enhancing stability, dispersion, and film formation. unlike solvent-based coatings, water-based systems require specialized surfactants to ensure compatibility, reduce surface tension, and improve substrate wetting (schwartz et al., 2016). this article provides an in-depth analysis of polyurethane surfactants, covering their chemistry, performance parameters, applications, and recent advancements.
with increasing environmental regulations (e.g., voc restrictions under reach and epa guidelines), the demand for high-performance, eco-friendly surfactants has surged (zhang et al., 2020). this review integrates findings from leading international research to present a detailed technical perspective.

2. chemistry and classification of pu surfactants
pu surfactants are amphiphilic molecules with hydrophilic (water-attracting) and hydrophobic (water-repelling) segments. they are classified into:
2.1 types of pu surfactants
| type | structure | key characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| anionic | sulfates, sulfonates | high stability, used in emulsion polymerization |
| cationic | quaternary ammonium salts | antimicrobial properties, used in specialty coatings |
| nonionic | polyethylene oxide (peo) chains | low foam, excellent compatibility |
| zwitterionic | betaines, phosphates | ph stability, high adhesion |
2.2 synthesis methods
-
pre-polymer process (reacting polyols with diisocyanates)
-
acetone process (for low-viscosity formulations)
-
melt dispersion (solvent-free synthesis)
a study by kim & park (2019) found that nonionic pu surfactants provide superior colloidal stability in water-based coatings compared to ionic types.
3. key performance parameters
the efficiency of pu surfactants is evaluated based on several critical parameters:

3.1 surface activity and stability
| parameter | target value | test method |
|---|---|---|
| surface tension | 25-35 mn/m | astm d1331 |
| critical micelle concentration (cmc) | 0.01-0.1 wt% | wilhelmy plate method |
| hydrophile-lipophile balance (hlb) | 8-16 (for coatings) | griffin’s method |
3.2 coating performance metrics
| property | influence of pu surfactant |
|---|---|
| film formation | reduces cracks, enhances leveling |
| dispersion stability | prevents pigment settling |
| water resistance | improves hydrophobicity |
| adhesion | enhances substrate wetting (astm d3359) |
3.3 environmental & safety compliance
| regulation | requirement |
|---|---|
| reach (eu) | voc <50 g/l |
| epa (usa) | non-haps (hazardous air pollutants) |
| gb 24409 (china) | heavy metal restrictions |
4. applications in water-based coatings
pu surfactants are widely used in:
4.1 architectural coatings
-
improves brushability and flow.
-
reduces foam in roller applications (wicks et al., 2017).
4.2 industrial coatings
-
enhances metal substrate adhesion (e.g., automotive primers).
-
used in uv-curable water-based systems (decker et al., 2021).
4.3 wood & furniture coatings
-
prevents grain raising and improves clarity.
4.4 ink & packaging coatings
-
provides anti-blocking and slip properties.
5. comparison with alternative surfactants
| property | pu surfactant | silicone surfactant | fluorosurfactant |
|---|---|---|---|
| surface tension reduction | moderate | high | very high |
| cost | medium | high | very high |
| environmental impact | low | moderate | high (pfas concerns) |
| foam generation | low | high | very low |
pu surfactants offer a balanced performance-to-cost ratio, making them ideal for most water-based coating applications (mishra et al., 2020).

6. recent innovations & future trends
6.1 bio-based pu surfactants
-
derived from castor oil, soy polyols (liu et al., 2022).
-
comply with oecd biodegradability standards.
6.2 smart responsive surfactants
-
ph-sensitive and thermo-responsive variants (wei et al., 2021).
6.3 nano-enhanced surfactants
-
silica nanoparticles improve scratch resistance (garcia et al., 2023).
7. challenges & solutions
| challenge | solution |
|---|---|
| foam stability | use defoamers (e.g., mineral oil blends) |
| hydrolysis sensitivity | incorporate carbodiimide stabilizers |
| high cost of specialty grades | optimize synthesis (e.g., one-pot reactions) |
8. conclusion
polyurethane surfactants are indispensable in water-based coatings, offering superior stability, eco-compliance, and versatility. future developments in bio-based and smart surfactants will further expand their applications.
9. references
-
schwartz, m. et al. (2016). waterborne polyurethanes. progress in polymer science.
-
zhang, y. et al. (2020). eco-friendly surfactants for coatings. journal of coatings technology.
-
kim, h., & park, s. (2019). nonionic pu surfactants in emulsions. colloids and surfaces a.
-
wicks, z. et al. (2017). coatings technology handbook. crc press.
-
decker, c. et al. (2021). uv-curable water-based systems. acs applied materials.
-
mishr
![DMAEE CAS1704-62-7 2-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethoxy]ethanol](http://dmaee.cn/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/cropped-logo1.jpg)